In the ruling, Appeal states that the alleged Barcelona "has no consistency. First, because it provides an incomplete images that easily lack of continuity between them is appreciated.
And secondly, because it is clear that who, no doubt, heard the expletive is the assistant referee, which did not even discuss the recurring ".
"From there it should be noted that the Arbitration Act is nourished not only by the direct assessment of the referee, but under Article 217.2.f) of the General Regulations of the RFEF, pick" incidents before, during and after the meeting, in the field or elsewhere of sporting facilities or outside them, provided that he has witnessed the incident, or having been observed by any other member of the refereeing corps, are you directly connected by the same, "he says.
Consequently, it matters for the purposes of the probative value of the minutes, that the facts stated are the direct assessment of the referee, refer it as an assistant referee.
It would be ludicrous to deny, a logical examination of what happened, the assistant immediately reported to the principal the serious incident occurred, triggering the immediate expulsion of the player, "he says. He explains that the Barcelona" criticizes what he calls' interpretive skills' Judge Competition, which was limited to review 'vehement and disrespectful attitude' of the penalized player, easily verifiable incomplete images of them that the appellant has provided.
Finally the appellant takes refuge in the offensive line was a simple outburst, without specific recipient. "" It is not so inferred from these images and, anyway, the argument does not destroy the superior probative value of the record, while not It is destroyed by an effective test (art.27.1 CD9 not sufficient for this ingenious simple explanation, which has no basis in reality, as claimed by the appellant, "believes.
